# Proof of Commitment in Blockchain ⎊ Term

**Published:** 2026-03-13
**Author:** Greeks.live
**Categories:** Term

---

![A dark blue, triangular base supports a complex, multi-layered circular mechanism. The circular component features segments in light blue, white, and a prominent green, suggesting a dynamic, high-tech instrument](https://term.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/algorithmic-collateral-management-protocol-for-perpetual-options-in-decentralized-autonomous-organizations.webp)

![A cutaway view reveals the inner workings of a multi-layered cylindrical object with glowing green accents on concentric rings. The abstract design suggests a schematic for a complex technical system or a financial instrument's internal structure](https://term.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/interoperable-architecture-of-proof-of-stake-validation-and-collateralized-derivative-tranching.webp)

## Essence

**Proof of Commitment** functions as a cryptographic mechanism designed to enforce temporal and financial accountability within decentralized systems. Unlike standard consensus models that prioritize transaction validation or stake weight, this framework mandates that participants lock assets or resources for predetermined durations to signal long-term alignment with protocol health. It transforms passive capital into active governance collateral, effectively aligning the incentives of liquidity providers and protocol stakeholders. 

> Proof of Commitment utilizes time-locked cryptographic pledges to align participant incentives with the long-term solvency and operational stability of decentralized financial networks.

The architecture relies on verifiable on-chain proof that specific capital has been removed from circulating supply for a fixed horizon. This commitment serves as a risk-mitigation tool, reducing the velocity of speculative outflows during market turbulence. By requiring this tangible pledge, the protocol creates a verifiable barrier to entry for participants, ensuring that those influencing network parameters possess skin in the game that cannot be instantaneously liquidated.

![A detailed rendering shows a high-tech cylindrical component being inserted into another component's socket. The connection point reveals inner layers of a white and blue housing surrounding a core emitting a vivid green light](https://term.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/cryptographic-consensus-mechanism-validation-protocol-demonstrating-secure-peer-to-peer-interoperability-in-cross-chain-environment.webp)

## Origin

The genesis of **Proof of Commitment** traces back to the limitations inherent in early decentralized finance models, where capital fluidity often induced extreme volatility and systemic fragility.

Initial governance structures relied heavily on simple token-weighted voting, which failed to distinguish between short-term mercenary liquidity and long-term protocol participants. The need to filter for durability prompted the development of time-locked asset structures.

- **Liquidity Stability**: Protocols required mechanisms to prevent sudden withdrawal of assets that supported margin engines or synthetic debt positions.

- **Governance Weighting**: Developers sought to grant greater decision-making authority to participants demonstrating enduring support through temporal locks.

- **Adversarial Resistance**: Architects identified that flash-loan-based governance attacks could be mitigated by requiring a commitment period that exceeds the duration of a single block.

This evolution represents a shift from purely transactional consensus toward a more robust model of resource-based reputation. By integrating time-decay factors and commitment requirements, early pioneers established the groundwork for systems where influence is proportional to the duration and depth of one’s economic pledge.

![This close-up view presents a sophisticated mechanical assembly featuring a blue cylindrical shaft with a keyhole and a prominent green inner component encased within a dark, textured housing. The design highlights a complex interface where multiple components align for potential activation or interaction, metaphorically representing a robust decentralized exchange DEX mechanism](https://term.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/interoperable-protocol-component-illustrating-key-management-for-synthetic-asset-issuance-and-high-leverage-derivatives.webp)

## Theory

The mechanical core of **Proof of Commitment** operates through a deterministic interplay between time-weighted collateralization and [smart contract](https://term.greeks.live/area/smart-contract/) execution. Mathematically, the commitment is a function of the locked quantity, the duration of the lock, and the prevailing risk profile of the protocol.

This framework introduces a distinct dimension to market microstructure, where price discovery is no longer solely driven by instantaneous supply and demand, but by the aggregate duration of committed capital.

| Component | Mechanism | Systemic Impact |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Temporal Lock | Smart contract escrow | Reduces active circulating supply |
| Pledge Weight | Time-weighted asset multiplier | Increases barrier for governance capture |
| Exit Penalty | Early withdrawal slashing | Enforces commitment fidelity |

The systemic implications involve a dampening effect on volatility. When a significant portion of assets is bound by **Proof of Commitment**, the protocol gains resilience against rapid deleveraging events. The physics of the system change: participants effectively trade their short-term liquidity for long-term influence and protocol stability. 

> The mathematical structure of commitment requires participants to internalize the opportunity cost of liquidity, thereby filtering for agents whose time preference matches the protocol lifecycle.

Market participants operate under an adversarial assumption, recognizing that locked capital acts as a shield against systemic contagion. The internal logic mandates that any attempt to influence the network requires a commensurate sacrifice of liquidity, which serves as a deterrent against malicious or short-sighted actions. This architecture echoes principles found in long-term incentive alignment strategies, where the cost of defection is dynamically adjusted based on the depth of the commitment.

![A three-dimensional rendering showcases a sequence of layered, smooth, and rounded abstract shapes unfolding across a dark background. The structure consists of distinct bands colored light beige, vibrant blue, dark gray, and bright green, suggesting a complex, multi-component system](https://term.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/decentralized-finance-protocol-stack-layering-collateralization-and-risk-management-primitives.webp)

## Approach

Current implementations of **Proof of Commitment** involve complex multi-layered escrow architectures.

Market participants interact with these systems by depositing assets into specialized vaults that enforce the commitment duration. These vaults often integrate with automated market makers or synthetic asset engines, providing a yield that is adjusted based on the duration of the lock. The strategic approach taken by institutional participants involves optimizing their capital allocation across multiple commitment tiers.

By staggering their locks, they manage liquidity needs while maintaining high-influence status within the governance framework. This requires sophisticated quantitative modeling to account for potential slippage, opportunity costs, and the risk of protocol-level slashing events.

- **Tiered Lockups**: Participants segment capital into varying time horizons to balance governance weight against personal liquidity requirements.

- **Yield Optimization**: Protocols incentivize longer commitments through higher rewards, creating a yield curve that reflects the market’s collective time preference.

- **Risk Hedging**: Sophisticated actors utilize secondary derivative markets to hedge against the price volatility of their locked assets during the commitment period.

The reality of these systems is that they are not static; they exist in a constant state of flux as market conditions shift. The interplay between committed capital and broader market cycles creates feedback loops that can amplify stability or, if poorly designed, lead to concentrated risk. The precision required to balance these factors is high, as the protocol relies on the accurate enforcement of lock periods to maintain its solvency.

![An abstract 3D render displays a complex modular structure composed of interconnected segments in different colors ⎊ dark blue, beige, and green. The open, lattice-like framework exposes internal components, including cylindrical elements that represent a flow of value or data within the structure](https://term.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/modular-layer-2-architecture-illustrating-cross-chain-liquidity-provision-and-derivative-instruments-collateralization-mechanism.webp)

## Evolution

The trajectory of **Proof of Commitment** has shifted from basic fixed-term lockups toward dynamic, variable-duration frameworks.

Early iterations were binary, offering a simple choice between locked and unlocked states. Modern protocols now utilize algorithmic adjustment mechanisms that recalibrate commitment requirements based on network stress indicators, such as liquidation volume or oracle latency. One might observe that the evolution mirrors the transition from rigid mechanical clocks to self-regulating feedback loops in biological systems ⎊ a shift toward greater adaptive complexity.

This transition reflects a deeper understanding of market participant psychology and the necessity of creating incentives that evolve alongside the protocol.

| Stage | Focus | Primary Driver |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Generation 1 | Fixed duration | Basic liquidity retention |
| Generation 2 | Tiered weighting | Governance alignment |
| Generation 3 | Dynamic algorithmic | Systemic risk mitigation |

These advancements have fundamentally altered how protocols manage their internal economies. By allowing the commitment parameters to adjust automatically, developers have created systems that are more responsive to macro-crypto volatility, ensuring that the level of required commitment remains appropriate to the current risk environment.

![Two teal-colored, soft-form elements are symmetrically separated by a complex, multi-component central mechanism. The inner structure consists of beige-colored inner linings and a prominent blue and green T-shaped fulcrum assembly](https://term.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/hard-fork-divergence-mechanism-facilitating-cross-chain-interoperability-and-asset-bifurcation-in-decentralized-ecosystems.webp)

## Horizon

Future developments in **Proof of Commitment** will likely integrate cross-chain validation and decentralized identity verification. The ability to verify commitment status across disparate blockchain environments will facilitate the creation of unified, protocol-agnostic reputation scores.

This will allow participants to leverage their commitment history in one protocol to gain advantages or reduced collateral requirements in another, effectively creating a cross-protocol ecosystem of trust.

> Future iterations of commitment mechanisms will move toward interoperable reputation systems, where historical pledges serve as verifiable credentials for decentralized credit and governance.

The strategic trajectory points toward the integration of predictive analytics into the commitment engine itself. By modeling expected volatility and liquidity needs, protocols will be able to dynamically adjust the cost and duration of commitments to maintain an optimal balance of stability and capital efficiency. This represents the next frontier in the development of decentralized financial infrastructure, where the goal is to create systems that are not only resilient but also capable of autonomous, self-optimizing economic behavior. 

## Glossary

### [Smart Contract](https://term.greeks.live/area/smart-contract/)

Code ⎊ This refers to self-executing agreements where the terms between buyer and seller are directly written into lines of code on a blockchain ledger.

## Discover More

### [Incentive Alignment Strategies](https://term.greeks.live/definition/incentive-alignment-strategies/)
![A detailed view showcases two opposing segments of a precision engineered joint, designed for intricate connection. This mechanical representation metaphorically illustrates the core architecture of cross-chain bridging protocols. The fluted component signifies the complex logic required for smart contract execution, facilitating data oracle consensus and ensuring trustless settlement between disparate blockchain networks. The bright green ring symbolizes a collateralization or validation mechanism, essential for mitigating risks like impermanent loss and ensuring robust risk management in decentralized options markets. The structure reflects an automated market maker's precise mechanism.](https://term.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/interoperability-of-decentralized-finance-protocols-illustrating-smart-contract-execution-and-cross-chain-bridging-mechanisms.webp)

Meaning ⎊ Methods used to align the interests of protocol participants to ensure sustainable and secure platform development.

### [Transaction Volume Scaling](https://term.greeks.live/term/transaction-volume-scaling/)
![A stylized visualization depicting a decentralized oracle network's core logic and structure. The central green orb signifies the smart contract execution layer, reflecting a high-frequency trading algorithm's core value proposition. The surrounding dark blue architecture represents the cryptographic security protocol and volatility hedging mechanisms. This structure illustrates the complexity of synthetic asset derivatives collateralization, where the layered design optimizes risk exposure management and ensures network stability within a decentralized finance ecosystem.](https://term.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/algorithmic-consensus-mechanism-core-value-proposition-layer-two-scaling-solution-architecture.webp)

Meaning ⎊ Transaction Volume Scaling enables the rapid, reliable settlement of derivative contracts necessary for efficient, high-velocity decentralized markets.

### [Capital Efficiency Ratios](https://term.greeks.live/definition/capital-efficiency-ratios/)
![A complex mechanical joint illustrates a cross-chain liquidity protocol where four dark shafts representing different assets converge. The central beige rod signifies the core smart contract logic driving the system. Teal gears symbolize the Automated Market Maker execution engine, facilitating capital efficiency and yield generation. This interconnected mechanism represents the composability of financial primitives, essential for advanced derivative strategies and managing collateralization risk within a robust decentralized ecosystem. The precision of the joint emphasizes the requirement for accurate oracle networks to ensure protocol stability.](https://term.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/decentralized-finance-composability-and-multi-asset-yield-generation-protocol-universal-joint-dynamics.webp)

Meaning ⎊ Metrics evaluating the volume generated per unit of liquidity, reflecting the productivity of locked assets.

### [Social Media Metrics](https://term.greeks.live/definition/social-media-metrics/)
![A precision-engineered coupling illustrates dynamic algorithmic execution within a decentralized derivatives protocol. This mechanism represents the seamless cross-chain interoperability required for efficient liquidity pools and yield generation in DeFi. The components symbolize different smart contracts interacting to manage risk and process high-speed on-chain data flow, ensuring robust synchronization and reliable oracle solutions for pricing and settlement. This conceptual design highlights the complexity of connecting diverse blockchain infrastructures for advanced financial engineering.](https://term.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/precision-smart-contract-integration-for-decentralized-derivatives-trading-protocols-and-cross-chain-interoperability.webp)

Meaning ⎊ The use of digital platform data and discourse analysis to measure and forecast changes in market sentiment and trends.

### [Collateral Management Practices](https://term.greeks.live/term/collateral-management-practices/)
![A detailed abstract visualization featuring nested square layers, creating a sense of dynamic depth and structured flow. The bands in colors like deep blue, vibrant green, and beige represent a complex system, analogous to a layered blockchain protocol L1/L2 solutions or the intricacies of financial derivatives. The composition illustrates the interconnectedness of collateralized assets and liquidity pools within a decentralized finance ecosystem. This abstract form represents the flow of capital and the risk-management required in options trading.](https://term.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/layered-protocol-architecture-and-collateral-management-in-decentralized-finance-ecosystems.webp)

Meaning ⎊ Collateral management ensures derivative stability by enforcing programmatic solvency rules that mitigate counterparty default in decentralized markets.

### [Options Trading Mentorship](https://term.greeks.live/term/options-trading-mentorship/)
![A conceptual representation of an advanced decentralized finance DeFi trading engine. The dark, sleek structure suggests optimized algorithmic execution, while the prominent green ring symbolizes a liquidity pool or successful automated market maker AMM settlement. The complex interplay of forms illustrates risk stratification and leverage ratio adjustments within a collateralized debt position CDP or structured derivative product. This design evokes the continuous flow of order flow and collateral management in high-frequency trading HFT environments.](https://term.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/streamlined-high-frequency-trading-algorithmic-execution-engine-for-decentralized-structured-product-derivatives-risk-stratification.webp)

Meaning ⎊ Options Trading Mentorship provides the rigorous framework required to transform decentralized derivative speculation into disciplined risk management.

### [Base Fee Mechanism](https://term.greeks.live/definition/base-fee-mechanism/)
![A high-precision instrument with a complex, ergonomic structure illustrates the intricate architecture of decentralized finance protocols. The interlocking blue and teal segments metaphorically represent the interoperability of various financial components, such as automated market makers and liquidity provision protocols. This design highlights the precision required for algorithmic trading strategies, risk hedging, and derivative structuring. The high-tech visual emphasizes efficient execution and accurate strike price determination, essential for managing market volatility and maximizing returns in yield farming.](https://term.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/algorithmic-execution-mechanism-design-for-complex-decentralized-derivatives-structuring-and-precision-volatility-hedging.webp)

Meaning ⎊ The protocol rule defining the minimum cost for transaction inclusion.

### [Real-Time Liquidation Engines](https://term.greeks.live/term/real-time-liquidation-engines/)
![A futuristic, automated entity represents a high-frequency trading sentinel for options protocols. The glowing green sphere symbolizes a real-time price feed, vital for smart contract settlement logic in derivatives markets. The geometric form reflects the complexity of pre-trade risk checks and liquidity aggregation protocols. This algorithmic system monitors volatility surface data to manage collateralization and risk exposure, embodying a deterministic approach within a decentralized autonomous organization DAO framework. It provides crucial market data and systemic stability to advanced financial derivatives.](https://term.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/decentralized-finance-oracle-and-algorithmic-trading-sentinel-for-price-feed-aggregation-and-risk-mitigation.webp)

Meaning ⎊ Real-Time Liquidation Engines automate collateral management to maintain systemic solvency within decentralized derivative markets.

### [Risk-Aware Order Book](https://term.greeks.live/term/risk-aware-order-book/)
![Dynamic layered structures illustrate multi-layered market stratification and risk propagation within options and derivatives trading ecosystems. The composition, moving from dark hues to light greens and creams, visualizes changing market sentiment from volatility clustering to growth phases. These layers represent complex derivative pricing models, specifically referencing liquidity pools and volatility surfaces in options chains. The flow signifies capital movement and the collateralization required for advanced hedging strategies and yield aggregation protocols, emphasizing layered risk exposure.](https://term.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/multi-layered-risk-propagation-analysis-in-decentralized-finance-protocols-and-options-hedging-strategies.webp)

Meaning ⎊ A risk-aware order book embeds solvency checks into matching logic to prevent systemic failure and stabilize decentralized derivative markets.

---

## Raw Schema Data

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "BreadcrumbList",
    "itemListElement": [
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 1,
            "name": "Home",
            "item": "https://term.greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 2,
            "name": "Term",
            "item": "https://term.greeks.live/term/"
        },
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 3,
            "name": "Proof of Commitment in Blockchain",
            "item": "https://term.greeks.live/term/proof-of-commitment-in-blockchain/"
        }
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "Article",
    "mainEntityOfPage": {
        "@type": "WebPage",
        "@id": "https://term.greeks.live/term/proof-of-commitment-in-blockchain/"
    },
    "headline": "Proof of Commitment in Blockchain ⎊ Term",
    "description": "Meaning ⎊ Proof of Commitment enforces temporal asset locking to align participant incentives with long-term protocol stability and reduce systemic volatility. ⎊ Term",
    "url": "https://term.greeks.live/term/proof-of-commitment-in-blockchain/",
    "author": {
        "@type": "Person",
        "name": "Greeks.live",
        "url": "https://term.greeks.live/author/greeks-live/"
    },
    "datePublished": "2026-03-13T16:28:41+00:00",
    "dateModified": "2026-03-13T16:30:26+00:00",
    "publisher": {
        "@type": "Organization",
        "name": "Greeks.live"
    },
    "articleSection": [
        "Term"
    ],
    "image": {
        "@type": "ImageObject",
        "url": "https://term.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/cryptographic-consensus-mechanism-validation-protocol-demonstrating-secure-peer-to-peer-interoperability-in-cross-chain-environment.jpg",
        "caption": "A detailed rendering shows a high-tech cylindrical component being inserted into another component's socket. The connection point reveals inner layers of a white and blue housing surrounding a core emitting a vivid green light. This image visually conceptualizes the secure handshake protocol required for cross-chain interoperability in a decentralized ecosystem. The precision connection and green glow symbolize the validation process where a cryptographic proof is successfully verified between two distinct blockchain networks or nodes. This process ensures data integrity and secure multi-party computation MPC during digital asset transfers without relying on a centralized authority. The layered structure and precise alignment represent the robust security architecture of a decentralized oracle network, essential for high-frequency trading HFT infrastructure and financial derivative execution platforms. It represents the moment of cryptographic verification for a smart contract execution, ensuring a trustless environment for tokenized assets."
    },
    "keywords": [
        "Algorithmic Commitment Adjustment",
        "Asset Circulation Control",
        "Asset Commitment Frameworks",
        "Asset Commitment Protocols",
        "Asset Commitment Strategies",
        "Asset Lock Horizon",
        "Asset Locking Duration",
        "Asset Locking Protocols",
        "Asset Locking Strategies",
        "Behavioral Game Theory Applications",
        "Blockchain Consensus Models",
        "Blockchain Incentive Structures",
        "Blockchain Protocol Security",
        "Blockchain Risk Mitigation",
        "Capital Efficiency Modeling",
        "Capital Fluidity Challenges",
        "Capital Pledge Mechanisms",
        "Commitment Cryptography",
        "Contagion Propagation Analysis",
        "Crosschain Commitment Validation",
        "Cryptographic Accountability",
        "Cryptographic Asset Locking",
        "Cryptographic Commitment Mechanisms",
        "Cryptographic Pledge Mechanisms",
        "Cryptographic Pledges",
        "Decentralized Asset Management",
        "Decentralized Capital Allocation",
        "Decentralized Capital Security",
        "Decentralized Derivative Systems",
        "Decentralized Economic Design",
        "Decentralized Finance Governance",
        "Decentralized Finance Security",
        "Decentralized Financial Networks",
        "Decentralized Financial Stability",
        "Decentralized Governance Models",
        "Decentralized Governance Structures",
        "Decentralized Market Microstructure",
        "Decentralized Protocol Architecture",
        "Decentralized Protocol Governance",
        "Decentralized Protocol Health",
        "Decentralized Protocol Integrity",
        "Decentralized Reputation Systems",
        "Decentralized Risk Management",
        "Decentralized System Accountability",
        "Decentralized System Resilience",
        "Derivative Liquidity Provision",
        "Financial Accountability Frameworks",
        "Financial Derivative Protocols",
        "Financial History Insights",
        "Financial Incentive Engineering",
        "Financial Network Stability",
        "Financial Risk Reduction",
        "Financial System Accountability",
        "Financial System Integrity",
        "Financial System Resilience",
        "Fundamental Network Analysis",
        "Governance Capture Deterrence",
        "Governance Collateralization",
        "Governance Parameter Control",
        "Governance Weight Optimization",
        "Incentive Alignment Mechanisms",
        "Liquidity Provider Incentives",
        "Liquidity Retention Strategies",
        "Long Term Capital Commitment",
        "Long Term Incentive Design",
        "Long Term Value Alignment",
        "Long Term Value Preservation",
        "Long-Term Incentive Alignment",
        "Long-Term Incentives",
        "Long-Term Protocol Alignment",
        "Long-Term Solvency",
        "Long-Term Value Accrual",
        "Macro-Crypto Correlations",
        "Market Microstructure Studies",
        "Market Turbulence Resilience",
        "Network Parameter Influence",
        "On Chain Asset Control",
        "On-Chain Commitment",
        "On-Chain Verification",
        "Onchain Collateral Commitment",
        "Operational Stability",
        "Order Flow Dynamics",
        "Participant Time Preference",
        "Programmable Money Security",
        "Protocol Incentive Alignment",
        "Protocol Physics Analysis",
        "Protocol Security Enhancements",
        "Protocol Solvency Architecture",
        "Protocol Stability Mechanisms",
        "Protocol Stakeholder Alignment",
        "Quantitative Risk Modeling",
        "Regulatory Compliance Strategies",
        "Risk Mitigation Strategies",
        "Risk Mitigation Tools",
        "Skin in the Game",
        "Smart Contract Escrow Mechanisms",
        "Smart Contract Security Frameworks",
        "Smart Contract Vulnerabilities",
        "Speculative Market Dynamics",
        "Speculative Outflow Reduction",
        "Stakeholder Alignment",
        "Systemic Contagion Resistance",
        "Systemic Risk Mitigation",
        "Systemic Volatility Control",
        "Systems Risk Assessment",
        "Tangible Pledge Requirements",
        "Temporal Asset Control",
        "Temporal Asset Locking",
        "Temporal Commitment Protocols",
        "Temporal Financial Accountability",
        "Temporal Liquidity Constraints",
        "Time-Weighted Capital Allocation",
        "Token Weighted Voting Limitations",
        "Tokenomics Design Principles",
        "Trend Forecasting Techniques",
        "Verifiable Time Locks",
        "Volatility Dampening Mechanisms",
        "Volatility Reduction Techniques"
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "WebSite",
    "url": "https://term.greeks.live/",
    "potentialAction": {
        "@type": "SearchAction",
        "target": "https://term.greeks.live/?s=search_term_string",
        "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
    }
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "WebPage",
    "@id": "https://term.greeks.live/term/proof-of-commitment-in-blockchain/",
    "mentions": [
        {
            "@type": "DefinedTerm",
            "@id": "https://term.greeks.live/area/smart-contract/",
            "name": "Smart Contract",
            "url": "https://term.greeks.live/area/smart-contract/",
            "description": "Code ⎊ This refers to self-executing agreements where the terms between buyer and seller are directly written into lines of code on a blockchain ledger."
        }
    ]
}
```


---

**Original URL:** https://term.greeks.live/term/proof-of-commitment-in-blockchain/