# Blockchain Scalability Challenges ⎊ Term

**Published:** 2026-03-13
**Author:** Greeks.live
**Categories:** Term

---

![A streamlined, dark object features an internal cross-section revealing a bright green, glowing cavity. Within this cavity, a detailed mechanical core composed of silver and white elements is visible, suggesting a high-tech or sophisticated internal mechanism](https://term.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/advanced-algorithmic-structure-for-decentralized-finance-derivatives-and-high-frequency-options-trading-strategies.webp)

![A series of colorful, layered discs or plates are visible through an opening in a dark blue surface. The discs are stacked side-by-side, exhibiting undulating, non-uniform shapes and colors including dark blue, cream, and bright green](https://term.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/decentralized-finance-options-tranches-dynamic-rebalancing-engine-for-automated-risk-stratification.webp)

## Essence

**Blockchain Scalability Challenges** define the structural limitations in throughput and latency inherent to decentralized ledgers. These constraints dictate the velocity at which a protocol can finalize [state transitions](https://term.greeks.live/area/state-transitions/) while maintaining the integrity of its consensus mechanism. Financial systems built upon these foundations encounter direct friction when transaction volume exceeds the capacity of validator nodes to process, verify, and propagate data across the distributed network. 

> The throughput bottleneck represents the physical limit of a decentralized network to process state updates without sacrificing security or censorship resistance.

At the architectural level, these challenges stem from the trilemma of balancing decentralization, security, and performance. When a protocol prioritizes a high degree of distribution, the resulting overhead in message passing and state synchronization often limits the total transactions per second. This environment creates an adversarial reality where market participants compete for limited block space, leading to congestion and volatility in execution costs.

![An abstract visualization featuring multiple intertwined, smooth bands or ribbons against a dark blue background. The bands transition in color, starting with dark blue on the outer layers and progressing to light blue, beige, and vibrant green at the core, creating a sense of dynamic depth and complexity](https://term.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/intertwined-multi-asset-collateralized-risk-layers-representing-decentralized-derivatives-markets-analysis.webp)

## Origin

The inception of **Blockchain Scalability Challenges** traces back to the fundamental design of the Bitcoin protocol, which prioritized network security and decentralization over raw transaction volume.

Early development favored small block sizes to ensure that individual users could operate nodes with minimal hardware, a decision that cemented the trade-off between block frequency and network decentralization.

- **Genesis Constraint**: The block size limit serves as a primary throttle on transaction throughput.

- **Consensus Overhead**: Proof of Work mechanisms require substantial time for global propagation and validation.

- **State Bloat**: Cumulative history requires increasing storage and computational demands for node operators.

This history reveals a rigid adherence to verification security, where every node processes every transaction. Such a design ensures total transparency and trustlessness but introduces systemic delays during periods of high demand. These early architectural choices set the stage for subsequent innovations aimed at decoupling [transaction execution](https://term.greeks.live/area/transaction-execution/) from the foundational consensus layer.

![A complex abstract composition features five distinct, smooth, layered bands in colors ranging from dark blue and green to bright blue and cream. The layers are nested within each other, forming a dynamic, spiraling pattern around a central opening against a dark background](https://term.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/interconnected-financial-derivatives-layers-representing-collateralized-debt-obligations-and-systemic-risk-propagation.webp)

## Theory

The mechanics of **Blockchain Scalability Challenges** reside in the interplay between computational throughput and the cost of state verification.

When a protocol executes complex smart contracts, the gas consumption acts as a metering mechanism, reflecting the underlying scarcity of network resources. This scarcity manifests in the pricing of derivatives, where latency in settlement directly impacts the risk-adjusted returns of arbitrage strategies.

| Mechanism | Scalability Impact |
| --- | --- |
| Execution Latency | Increases risk of stale pricing in derivatives |
| Propagation Delay | Creates windows for front-running and MEV |
| State Accumulation | Limits participation of low-spec hardware |

> Effective protocol design necessitates the decoupling of transaction execution from global consensus to achieve linear scaling.

Quantitative analysis of these systems reveals that the marginal cost of adding a transaction to the chain is non-linear. As the network approaches capacity, the competition for inclusion leads to a spike in gas fees, which acts as a tax on capital efficiency. This dynamic is a critical factor for market makers who must hedge positions across fragmented liquidity pools, often suffering from slippage due to the underlying chain’s inability to process rapid-fire orders.

![A high-resolution, abstract close-up reveals a sophisticated structure composed of fluid, layered surfaces. The forms create a complex, deep opening framed by a light cream border, with internal layers of bright green, royal blue, and dark blue emerging from a deeper dark grey cavity](https://term.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/abstract-layered-derivative-structures-and-complex-options-trading-strategies-for-risk-management-and-capital-optimization.webp)

## Approach

Current methodologies to address **Blockchain Scalability Challenges** involve shifting the computational burden away from the main chain.

Layer 2 solutions, such as rollups, utilize cryptographic proofs to bundle multiple transactions into a single state update, thereby compressing the data footprint on the base layer. This transition requires sophisticated trust assumptions, moving the security model from pure verification to reliance on validity proofs or fraud proofs.

- **Optimistic Rollups**: Rely on fraud proofs to maintain state integrity with lower initial computational overhead.

- **Zero-Knowledge Proofs**: Provide cryptographic certainty of validity, enabling high-throughput state transitions.

- **Sharding**: Distributes the ledger across multiple sub-networks to increase total network capacity.

These approaches transform the market structure by introducing new layers of latency and security risk. For a derivatives trader, the shift to these solutions necessitates a re-evaluation of counterparty risk and liquidation mechanics. The speed of execution is no longer solely a function of the base chain’s performance but depends on the availability and efficiency of the sequencers or provers operating the secondary layer.

![A close-up view shows a stylized, multi-layered structure with undulating, intertwined channels of dark blue, light blue, and beige colors, with a bright green rod protruding from a central housing. This abstract visualization represents the intricate multi-chain architecture necessary for advanced scaling solutions in decentralized finance](https://term.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/interoperable-multi-chain-layering-architecture-visualizing-scalability-and-high-frequency-cross-chain-data-throughput-channels.webp)

## Evolution

The transition from monolithic to modular architectures marks the current phase of development.

Protocols now focus on specializing layers for execution, settlement, and data availability. This separation allows for greater optimization, as each component can be tuned to meet specific requirements without compromising the integrity of the entire system.

> Modular blockchain architectures allow for specialized resource allocation, effectively separating execution from settlement to resolve congestion.

The evolution reflects a broader trend toward horizontal scaling. By distributing the workload, networks mitigate the risks associated with centralization while attempting to maintain high throughput. This development is essential for the maturation of decentralized finance, as it enables the deployment of complex derivatives that require high-frequency updates and predictable settlement times.

The move toward this modularity represents a sophisticated response to the limitations of earlier, more rigid system designs.

![A series of mechanical components, resembling discs and cylinders, are arranged along a central shaft against a dark blue background. The components feature various colors, including dark blue, beige, light gray, and teal, with one prominent bright green band near the right side of the structure](https://term.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/layered-structured-product-tranches-collateral-requirements-financial-engineering-derivatives-architecture-visualization.webp)

## Horizon

The future of **Blockchain Scalability Challenges** hinges on the integration of asynchronous execution environments and cross-chain interoperability protocols. As systems move toward parallelized processing, the bottleneck will likely shift from raw transaction throughput to the management of shared state across interconnected networks. Financial strategies will require advanced tooling to manage risk in environments where liquidity is split across heterogeneous layers.

| Trend | Implication |
| --- | --- |
| Parallel Execution | Higher throughput but complex state management |
| Cross-Chain Messaging | Increased systemic risk from bridge vulnerabilities |
| Modular Specialization | Lower entry barriers for specialized protocols |

Success in this environment demands a transition toward autonomous agents capable of optimizing capital across these fragmented layers. The ultimate goal remains the creation of a seamless financial infrastructure that functions with the efficiency of centralized systems while retaining the transparency and censorship resistance of decentralized ones. The persistent challenge lies in managing the trade-offs between speed and systemic risk as the infrastructure becomes increasingly complex. 

## Glossary

### [Transaction Execution](https://term.greeks.live/area/transaction-execution/)

Mechanism ⎊ Transaction execution in crypto derivatives involves the process of matching a buy or sell order and finalizing the trade.

### [State Transitions](https://term.greeks.live/area/state-transitions/)

Transition ⎊ State transitions define the fundamental mechanism by which a blockchain network updates its ledger in response to new transactions.

### [Systemic Risk](https://term.greeks.live/area/systemic-risk/)

Failure ⎊ The default or insolvency of a major market participant, particularly one with significant interconnected derivative positions, can initiate a chain reaction across the ecosystem.

## Discover More

### [Off-Chain Matching Logic](https://term.greeks.live/term/off-chain-matching-logic/)
![A detailed rendering of a precision-engineered coupling mechanism joining a dark blue cylindrical component. The structure features a central housing, off-white interlocking clasps, and a bright green ring, symbolizing a locked state or active connection. This design represents a smart contract collateralization process where an underlying asset is securely locked by specific parameters. It visualizes the secure linkage required for cross-chain interoperability and the settlement process within decentralized derivative protocols, ensuring robust risk management through token locking and maintaining collateral requirements for synthetic assets.](https://term.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/decentralized-finance-asset-collateralization-smart-contract-lockup-mechanism-for-cross-chain-interoperability.webp)

Meaning ⎊ Off-Chain Matching Logic enables high-speed derivative execution by separating order matching from blockchain settlement for optimal performance.

### [Off-Chain Transaction Processing](https://term.greeks.live/term/off-chain-transaction-processing/)
![A high-frequency trading algorithmic execution pathway is visualized through an abstract mechanical interface. The central hub, representing a liquidity pool within a decentralized exchange DEX or centralized exchange CEX, glows with a vibrant green light, indicating active liquidity flow. This illustrates the seamless data processing and smart contract execution for derivative settlements. The smooth design emphasizes robust risk mitigation and cross-chain interoperability, critical for efficient automated market making AMM systems in DeFi.](https://term.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/high-frequency-trading-algorithmic-risk-management-systems-and-cex-liquidity-provision-mechanisms-visualization.webp)

Meaning ⎊ Off-Chain Transaction Processing enables high-frequency derivative trading by decoupling execution from settlement to overcome layer-one latency.

### [Transaction Propagation Latency](https://term.greeks.live/term/transaction-propagation-latency/)
![Concentric and layered shapes in dark blue, light blue, green, and beige form a spiral arrangement, symbolizing nested derivatives and complex financial instruments within DeFi. Each layer represents a different tranche of risk exposure or asset collateralization, reflecting the interconnected nature of smart contract protocols. The central vortex illustrates recursive liquidity flow and the potential for cascading liquidations. This visual metaphor captures the dynamic interplay of market depth and systemic risk in options trading on decentralized exchanges.](https://term.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/nested-derivatives-tranches-and-recursive-liquidity-aggregation-in-decentralized-finance-ecosystems.webp)

Meaning ⎊ Transaction Propagation Latency determines the critical temporal gap between trade submission and network consensus, dictating market risk profiles.

### [State Transition Latency](https://term.greeks.live/term/state-transition-latency/)
![An abstract visualization representing layered structured financial products in decentralized finance. The central glowing green light symbolizes the high-yield junior tranche, where liquidity pools generate high risk-adjusted returns. The surrounding concentric layers represent senior tranches, illustrating how smart contracts manage collateral and risk exposure across different levels of synthetic assets. This architecture captures the intricate mechanics of automated market makers and complex perpetual futures strategies within a complex DeFi ecosystem.](https://term.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/nested-smart-contract-architecture-visualizing-risk-tranches-and-yield-generation-within-a-defi-ecosystem.webp)

Meaning ⎊ State Transition Latency defines the critical delay between financial action and final settlement, dictating the operational viability of derivatives.

### [Mempool Transaction Time](https://term.greeks.live/term/mempool-transaction-time/)
![Abstract, undulating layers of dark gray and blue form a complex structure, interwoven with bright green and cream elements. This visualization depicts the dynamic data throughput of a blockchain network, illustrating the flow of transaction streams and smart contract logic across multiple protocols. The layers symbolize risk stratification and cross-chain liquidity dynamics within decentralized finance ecosystems, where diverse assets interact through automated market makers AMMs and derivatives contracts.](https://term.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/visualization-of-decentralized-finance-protocols-and-cross-chain-transaction-flow-in-layer-1-networks.webp)

Meaning ⎊ Mempool transaction time is the critical duration between trade broadcast and settlement, directly impacting execution risk and option pricing accuracy.

### [System Design](https://term.greeks.live/definition/system-design/)
![A visual metaphor for a high-frequency algorithmic trading engine, symbolizing the core mechanism for processing volatility arbitrage strategies within decentralized finance infrastructure. The prominent green circular component represents yield generation and liquidity provision in options derivatives markets. The complex internal blades metaphorically represent the constant flow of market data feeds and smart contract execution. The segmented external structure signifies the modularity of structured product protocols and decentralized autonomous organization governance in a Web3 ecosystem, emphasizing precision in automated risk management.](https://term.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/algorithmic-volatility-arbitrage-processing-within-decentralized-finance-structured-product-protocols.webp)

Meaning ⎊ The structural blueprint governing how financial protocols process, secure, and settle digital asset transactions safely.

### [Cryptographic State Machine](https://term.greeks.live/term/cryptographic-state-machine/)
![A detailed rendering of a complex mechanical joint where a vibrant neon green glow, symbolizing high liquidity or real-time oracle data feeds, flows through the core structure. This sophisticated mechanism represents a decentralized automated market maker AMM protocol, specifically illustrating the crucial connection point or cross-chain interoperability bridge between distinct blockchains. The beige piece functions as a collateralization mechanism within a complex financial derivatives framework, facilitating seamless cross-chain asset swaps and smart contract execution for advanced yield farming strategies.](https://term.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/cross-chain-interoperability-mechanism-for-decentralized-finance-derivative-structuring-and-automated-protocol-stacks.webp)

Meaning ⎊ The cryptographic state machine provides a deterministic, trustless architecture for the automated execution and settlement of complex derivatives.

### [Liquidity Cycle Impacts](https://term.greeks.live/term/liquidity-cycle-impacts/)
![A coiled, segmented object illustrates the high-risk, interconnected nature of financial derivatives and decentralized protocols. The intertwined form represents market feedback loops where smart contract execution and dynamic collateralization ratios are linked. This visualization captures the continuous flow of liquidity pools providing capital for options contracts and futures trading. The design highlights systemic risk and interoperability issues inherent in complex structured products across decentralized exchanges DEXs, emphasizing the need for robust risk management frameworks. The continuous structure symbolizes the potential for cascading effects from asset correlation in volatile market conditions.](https://term.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/dynamic-collateralization-in-decentralized-finance-representing-interconnected-smart-contract-risk-management-protocols.webp)

Meaning ⎊ Liquidity cycle impacts dictate the structural stability and pricing regimes of decentralized derivative markets through periodic capital shifts.

### [Call Provision](https://term.greeks.live/definition/call-provision/)
![A detailed rendering of a futuristic mechanism symbolizing a robust decentralized derivatives protocol architecture. The design visualizes the intricate internal operations of an algorithmic execution engine. The central spiraling element represents the complex smart contract logic managing collateralization and margin requirements. The glowing core symbolizes real-time data feeds essential for price discovery. The external frame depicts the governance structure and risk parameters that ensure system stability within a trustless environment. This high-precision component encapsulates automated market maker functionality and volatility dynamics for financial derivatives.](https://term.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/algorithmic-execution-engine-for-decentralized-perpetual-contracts-and-integrated-liquidity-provision-protocols.webp)

Meaning ⎊ An issuer right to repurchase a security before maturity, shifting reinvestment risk to the holder based on market triggers.

---

## Raw Schema Data

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "BreadcrumbList",
    "itemListElement": [
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 1,
            "name": "Home",
            "item": "https://term.greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 2,
            "name": "Term",
            "item": "https://term.greeks.live/term/"
        },
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 3,
            "name": "Blockchain Scalability Challenges",
            "item": "https://term.greeks.live/term/blockchain-scalability-challenges/"
        }
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "Article",
    "mainEntityOfPage": {
        "@type": "WebPage",
        "@id": "https://term.greeks.live/term/blockchain-scalability-challenges/"
    },
    "headline": "Blockchain Scalability Challenges ⎊ Term",
    "description": "Meaning ⎊ Blockchain scalability challenges dictate the performance limits and risk profiles of decentralized financial instruments within global markets. ⎊ Term",
    "url": "https://term.greeks.live/term/blockchain-scalability-challenges/",
    "author": {
        "@type": "Person",
        "name": "Greeks.live",
        "url": "https://term.greeks.live/author/greeks-live/"
    },
    "datePublished": "2026-03-13T11:01:04+00:00",
    "dateModified": "2026-03-13T11:01:35+00:00",
    "publisher": {
        "@type": "Organization",
        "name": "Greeks.live"
    },
    "articleSection": [
        "Term"
    ],
    "image": {
        "@type": "ImageObject",
        "url": "https://term.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/cross-chain-interoperability-protocol-facilitating-atomic-swaps-between-decentralized-finance-layer-2-solutions.jpg",
        "caption": "A detailed mechanical connection between two cylindrical objects is shown in a cross-section view, revealing internal components including a central threaded shaft, glowing green rings, and sinuous beige structures. This visualization metaphorically represents the sophisticated architecture of cross-chain interoperability protocols, specifically illustrating Layer 2 solutions in decentralized finance. The two modular components symbolize distinct blockchain networks or sidechains, while the intricate connection mechanism signifies the underlying smart contract logic and algorithmic execution required for secure atomic swaps and instantaneous settlement processes. The glowing green elements highlight real-time validation and network activity within the consensus mechanism. This modular design facilitates seamless bridging of tokenized assets and data transfer, enhancing network scalability and liquidity provision for derivatives trading and risk hedging strategies. It underscores the critical importance of collateralization within a robust, interoperable financial ecosystem."
    },
    "keywords": [
        "Adversarial Market Participants",
        "Arbitrage Capital Efficiency",
        "Architectural Constraints",
        "Asynchronous State Transitions",
        "Behavioral Game Theory",
        "Bitcoin Protocol Design",
        "Block Confirmation Times",
        "Block Size Optimization",
        "Block Space Competition",
        "Block Space Scarcity",
        "Blockchain Architecture Optimization",
        "Blockchain Governance Models",
        "Blockchain Infrastructure Development",
        "Blockchain Interoperability Challenges",
        "Blockchain Limitations",
        "Blockchain Performance Optimization",
        "Blockchain State Bloat",
        "Blockchain Trilemma Trade-Offs",
        "Byzantine Fault Tolerance",
        "Consensus Algorithm Efficiency",
        "Consensus Mechanism Integrity",
        "Consensus Mechanism Scalability",
        "Consensus Protocol Improvements",
        "Cross-Chain Interoperability",
        "Cryptocurrency Network Capacity",
        "Cryptographic Proof Verification",
        "Cryptographic Scalability Limits",
        "Data Propagation Challenges",
        "Data Storage Limitations",
        "Decentralization Tradeoffs",
        "Decentralized Application Performance",
        "Decentralized Application Scaling",
        "Decentralized Exchange Limitations",
        "Decentralized Finance Limitations",
        "Decentralized Finance Liquidity",
        "Decentralized Ledger Constraints",
        "Decentralized Ledger Throughput",
        "Decentralized Market Microstructure",
        "Decentralized Network Resilience",
        "Decentralized System Performance",
        "Derivative Settlement Challenges",
        "Distributed Consensus Protocols",
        "Distributed Ledger Security",
        "Distributed Ledger Technology",
        "Distributed Network Limitations",
        "Early Blockchain Development",
        "Execution Cost Volatility",
        "Financial History Parallels",
        "Financial Instrument Performance",
        "Financial Settlement Finality",
        "Fundamental Network Analysis",
        "Global Market Friction",
        "High-Frequency Trading Latency",
        "Instrument Type Shifts",
        "Layer Two Settlement",
        "Layer Two Solutions",
        "Macro-Crypto Correlation",
        "Margin Engine Performance",
        "Market Evolution Dynamics",
        "Market Microstructure Analysis",
        "Message Passing Overhead",
        "Modular Blockchain Design",
        "Network Bandwidth Constraints",
        "Network Capacity Planning",
        "Network Congestion Dynamics",
        "Network Congestion Economics",
        "Network Congestion Mitigation",
        "Network Latency Constraints",
        "Network Latency Issues",
        "Network Monitoring Tools",
        "Network Resource Allocation",
        "Network Scalability Metrics",
        "Network Scalability Solutions",
        "Network Scalability Trade Offs",
        "Network Security Considerations",
        "Network Upgrade Strategies",
        "Off-Chain Scaling Solutions",
        "On-Chain Transaction Costs",
        "Order Flow Processing",
        "Parallelized Execution Environments",
        "Plasma Frameworks",
        "Proof of Stake Scalability",
        "Proof of Work Limitations",
        "Protocol Consensus Bottlenecks",
        "Protocol Physics Analysis",
        "Quantitative Finance Modeling",
        "Regulatory Arbitrage Impacts",
        "Risk Sensitivity Analysis",
        "Rollup Scalability Architecture",
        "Rollup Technologies",
        "Scalability Engineering Challenges",
        "Scalability Infrastructure Upgrades",
        "Scalability Innovation Strategies",
        "Scalability Research Initiatives",
        "Scalability Testing Methodologies",
        "Scalability Trilemma Balance",
        "Security versus Performance",
        "Sharding Techniques",
        "Sidechain Implementations",
        "Smart Contract Gas Optimization",
        "Smart Contract Scalability",
        "Smart Contract Vulnerabilities",
        "State Channels Optimization",
        "State Synchronization Limits",
        "State Transition Finalization",
        "Systemic Risk Management",
        "Systems Risk Propagation",
        "Throughput Bottlenecks",
        "Tokenomics Design",
        "Trading Venue Evolution",
        "Transaction Batching Strategies",
        "Transaction Execution Speed",
        "Transaction Fee Dynamics",
        "Transaction per Second",
        "Transaction Processing Speed",
        "Transaction Throughput Optimization",
        "Trend Forecasting Analysis",
        "Validator Incentives Alignment",
        "Validator Node Capacity",
        "Validator Node Requirements",
        "Value Accrual Mechanisms",
        "Zero-Knowledge Validity Proofs"
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "WebSite",
    "url": "https://term.greeks.live/",
    "potentialAction": {
        "@type": "SearchAction",
        "target": "https://term.greeks.live/?s=search_term_string",
        "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
    }
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "WebPage",
    "@id": "https://term.greeks.live/term/blockchain-scalability-challenges/",
    "mentions": [
        {
            "@type": "DefinedTerm",
            "@id": "https://term.greeks.live/area/state-transitions/",
            "name": "State Transitions",
            "url": "https://term.greeks.live/area/state-transitions/",
            "description": "Transition ⎊ State transitions define the fundamental mechanism by which a blockchain network updates its ledger in response to new transactions."
        },
        {
            "@type": "DefinedTerm",
            "@id": "https://term.greeks.live/area/transaction-execution/",
            "name": "Transaction Execution",
            "url": "https://term.greeks.live/area/transaction-execution/",
            "description": "Mechanism ⎊ Transaction execution in crypto derivatives involves the process of matching a buy or sell order and finalizing the trade."
        },
        {
            "@type": "DefinedTerm",
            "@id": "https://term.greeks.live/area/systemic-risk/",
            "name": "Systemic Risk",
            "url": "https://term.greeks.live/area/systemic-risk/",
            "description": "Failure ⎊ The default or insolvency of a major market participant, particularly one with significant interconnected derivative positions, can initiate a chain reaction across the ecosystem."
        }
    ]
}
```


---

**Original URL:** https://term.greeks.live/term/blockchain-scalability-challenges/