Adjudication Consensus Models

Adjudication Consensus Models define the mathematical and social rules by which a group of jurors arrives at a final decision in a dispute. These models can range from simple majority voting to more complex weighted systems that consider the stake size or historical accuracy of the participants.

The model must be robust against various attack vectors, such as collusion or sybil attacks, where a single entity attempts to influence the outcome. By formalizing the path to consensus, these models provide predictability and legitimacy to the resolution process.

The choice of model often depends on the sensitivity of the dispute and the value of the assets involved. Some models include multi-round voting to allow for deliberation and evidence review, ensuring that the final decision is well-informed.

This is the core logic that transforms individual juror opinions into a binding, protocol-wide resolution.